The New Physics really has the details now:
LOVE is Truly the Cause of Gravity!..
with Dan Winter commentary on Nassim's defense of his Proton as Black Hole physics which Focuses on Golden Ratio: Perfect Embedding IS The Attractive Force! - Early Sept. 2010- S.France & Poland
by Dan Winter - url: goldenmean.info/gravityislove
Implosion Group with Dan Winter- is Announcing: All New Suite of Fractal Tech: Centripetal Technology is LIFE AFFIRMING!
Note: The "Sacred Geometry" of Golden Ratio embedding / 'Love' - is also key to planet saving hot technologies:
Implosive / Centripetal / Self Organizing / Life Affirming / BIO-ACTIVE 'Fractal Field' Technologies..
New Double Growth with Implosion! TheImploder.com , fractalfield.com , fractalfield.com/pyraphi , Breakthru-Technologies.com
goldenmean.info Now @ 2 Million Hits/ Month! > Main Implosion Group FILM LIBRARY, or return to Main Index
- Implosion Group distribution of Dan Winter's work- Main Index: goldenmean.info
TWO Million hits/month, Link: 25,100 Websites which link to goldenmean.info
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe email to: firstname.lastname@example.org , Language Index- English, French, Spanish, German, Italian-new Polish!
>SiteSearch or Search Site w/Yahoo DVD's/Books - "World Tours!">Course Calendar - Films Online - HeartTuner/BlissTuner "TheLoveTuner!"
Newest Implosion Powerpoint! Dan Winter's BOOKS:1.Alphabet of the Heart, 2. EartHeart, 3.Implosions Grand Attractor,
4. Implosion:Secret Science of Ecstasy&Immortality , - Origin of Alphabets Physics - Stellar Purpose/History of DNA Articles - new master Photo Galleries.
goldenmean.info actual traffic data -taken Oct 19,2010
Understanding 'Get FRACTAL or Get Dead!' (Architecture of Life/ our bumper sticker):
IF the stubborn fool scientists of Earth understood HOW golden ratio fractality CAUSES gravity..& all centripetal forces
THEN they might be competent to give you some decent advice on how to hold your aura together..
(hint: only way to get sustainable OR immortal OR thru death...)> otherwise you're stuck with obsolete religion for info-on that..
Implosion due to Charge Fractality is the Cause of Life, of Gravity,and Cause of ANY System to Emerge from Chaos!
- Here is Proof ! goldenmean.info/goldenproof < The CLIMAX of our Research.
What is the possibility that Planck Length x Golden Ratio= The Hydrogen Radii (Winter's new equation)
happens by accident? Answer: ZERO!! Einstein's (&modern physics) failure to figure out why an object falls
to the ground, directly resulted in the incredible stupidity not to learn what (FRACTAL) field effect CAUSES LIFE -
all of this SPECIFICALLYbecause of the arrogant ignorance of the simple observation that Golden Ratio SOLVES the problem of constructive wave interference
& therefore of compression-THE PERFECTED CHARGE COLLAPSE WHICH IS THE CAUSE OF GRAVITY
and therefore of the perfected charge distribution causing life and mind..read about it (&see films): goldenmean.info/selforganization
Dan Winter >EVENT CALENDAR 2010 -
our hit rate has doubled to 200,000 per day- there are many who care about actually understanding the electric field which causes life..
'In my last life' in this life - while an organist and choir director in several churches- one of our favorite songs was:
God is Love and he who abides in Love abides in God.. and God in Him..
with this article I would like to propose a science corollary to the above:
Gold is Embedding - and he who gets fractal and embeds well (learns to love) gets immortal (wave sustainable- in religious language: 'saved')
- he who does not get fractal and embed well (Golden Ratio defines attraction)... unfortuneately - gets dead.
Why do I call the physics community arrogant and stupid?
"The difference between stupidity and ignorance is that you can teach an ignorant person." - Alias Grace, by Margaret Atwood
Supposing you wanted to track the AMAZING sequence of events that allowed the PHYSICS COMMUNITY to NOT KNOW why an object falls to the ground- all the while still arrogantly pretending to tell you how the universe works and assembles itself ..in a way that is wrong-does not understand attractive force.
so far I have failed to 'embed well' with conventional physics schizophrenic idea that gravity and charge are made of a different substance
- almost as schizophrenic as the typical religious fundamentalist who is delusionally certain - that his 'spirit' is SEPARATE from physics..
- notice how this separateness- OPPOSITE OF ONENESS- is the root of the political danger posed by religious fundamentalism- being SEPARATE from the unifying logic which embeds us all in pure principle. The scientist who fails to embrace unified field thinking- is exactly LIKE those who irrationally consider their religion- immune from ONEness!
The problem with physicists- is they do NOT know that golden ratio IS the generalized geometry of most constructive wave interference- (evidence: goldenmean.info/matrix ) AND they are not willing to check. This is why they are stuck not knowing that this is ALSO the solution to (charge) compression- and of course (as Einstein said)- perfecting compression IS the solution to unified field - and therefore the solution to gravity. In this article- you see that even Nassim Haramein- who has concluded with exquisite logic- that Golden Ratio is the universal scaling law to all of matter and black holes -he in fact is unaware WHY (because only this geometry actually permits compression- as constuctive interference) See below- so he says: golden ratio is the RESULT of black hole dynamics- when in fact the opposite is the case: golden ratio (perfected charge conjugation of velocity phases-golden ratio recursive adding and multiplying of wave speed produces the acceleration from compression CALLED graivity) is the CAUSE of black hole and gravity dynamics- which we first taught the physics community 5 years ago in Budapest. (Still we regard this difference with Nassim- in part semantic and gratefully acknowledge his work! Nassim's new article exerpt reprinted below also ) .
My Paper Presented Sept 2006:-"Is Fractality: The Electrical Mechanism of Gravity, (and Perception and Color Descrimination) pdf - from the CD / Proceedings: (w/ color graphics) 5.1 Meg : Ch19ADanWinter.pdf , Conference Links(w. Nassim, Eliz Rauscher, Richard Amoroso & Many others): goldenmean.info/budapest08/physicsoverview.html
Paul LaViolette on the other hand in our conversation was evidently - COMPLETELY unaware of the importance of Golden Ratio to physics- so it seems there is no mystery to why he has no room for Nassim's black hole physics in his Sub quantum kinetics.
Related: goldenmean.info/gravitycode - exerpt- "POINCARE AGREES with WINTER! - Dan Winter's first paper on Self Similarity / Fractality as the Symmetry of Charge Collapse and therefore CAUSE of Gravity - hinges on charge waves approaching non-destructive compression - based on Golden Ratio symmetry. When we examine physics best current idea of the symmetry of gravity itself - it resolves to what is called the S3# Poincare Dodecahedral Space. this 'Lie' or symmetry group - 60 / 120 element array fits perfectly the dodeca icosa symmetry - for capacitive charge which our new theory concludes will MAKE GRAVITY. This is because the same Golden Ratio spacing beween every path curve on Dodec / Icos ('Star Mother Kit' table of x,y,z coordinates below) is exactly that needed to turn Charge Compression IN to Acceleration (Gravity)."
See the evidence that the self-similar FRACTALITY between the nucleus- versus the electrons- is the reason atoms have and make gravity, - (constructive charge collapse is Einstein's notion of gravity- which fractality by Golden Ratio solves) , ... and -
the evidence in my original equation: proof that golden ratio (fractality) is the MECHANISM of the formation of hydrogen,
and that golden ratio is the principle behind the scaling of all masses (Nassim Haramein - also Global Scaling..),
and that golden ratio is the essence of the E8 unified field theory -
- and we showed them the software proof- golden ratio is the generalized solution to ALL constructive wave interference
(and therefore compression, and therefore gravity)
(and therefore all centripetal forces- like gravity and life and perception - and therefore all self-organization)
-... don't you think - as a physicist you would need to check that?
- Well we asked them- (see our interview with Paul LaViolette- guess he didn't think it was important...) .. and they did not.
--Sat Aug 21, 2010- News from Implosion Group and Dan Winter
NEW:TheImploder.com team announces- All Imploder Orders were shipped Aug 23-Priority Air from France.
NEW:TheImploder.com team announces- All Imploder Orders were shipped Aug 23-Priority Air from France. Next group- shipments start: Sept 3.
Our revolutionary Growth Doubling TheImploder.com - updates:
|Also- Exciting Progress BUILDING THE ELECTRIC FIELD THAT CAUSES LIFE: fractalfield.com/pyraphi
Applications: life extension, food storage extension, growth acceleration, electrosmog reduction... MUCH more!
Harmony of the Cosmos Festival Poland:3-5 September 2010. with Janusz Zagorski januszzagorski.pl/imprezy/harmonia-kosmosu/
New Announcements; Events with Dan Winter- Prague: Brno : and Skola v Haluzicich, Nesovice. Czech.
-- Then: Country retreat conference- English and Spanish- St Maria De Besora- Outside- Barcelona, Spain: Sept 24- 26 - 3 Days- Contact: marco (at) r-evolucio.org
Update Sept 25,2010: Newest major film series release-Dan Winter Krakow Lectures (English & Polish): goldenmean.info/krakow
-- now back to our conversation about Love and Gravity.. and Science:
Was just chatting with Noah- our partner there in Byron Australia- a leader of Byron New Energy Research- he was telling me with great enthusiasm - about what he thought was a high point of Nassim Haramein's ( theresonanceproject.org ) - recent living room presentations there. Our friend Dudly asked if Gravity was really caused by LOVE? And Nassim spent considerable time explaining the science to confirm - that Love really IS the nature of gravity!
First we discoverd Golden Ratio identifies the change in pressure over time- of the TOUCH that says I LOVE YOU: goldenmean.info/touch
Then we discovered (with Korotkov's help- then I implemented in my BLISSTUNER invention - which is now being stolen from me by Frank Van Den Bovenkamp)
that the moment of peak perception- bliss - enlightenment- was defined by Golden Ratio in brainwaves ( goldenmean.info/clinicalintro - EEG power spectra for golden ratio - I pioneered the measurement of bliss /enlightenment - with my BlissTuner invention - now unethically stolen by Frank Van Den Bovenkamp)
Then medicine discovered: the healthy heart is a fractal heart. ( References/ pictures: goldenmean.info/holarchy also - goldenmean.info/heartmathmistake
Then - I pioneered the proof that Golden Ratio perfects fractality because being perfect wave interference it is therefore perfect compression
I really got the picture this month- more below- why scientists have been so arrogantly ignorant in not discovering the cause of gravity - after interviewing Paul LaViolette in Athens- about why he did not accept- Nassim's 'black hole' theory in his 'sub quantum kinetics'- It is simple: he is unaware Golden Ratio IS perfected constructive wave interference.. and therefore THE solution to compression - and therefore as Einstein said- the solution to compression is the solution to gravity.
It is my view that all centripetal forces- like gravity, life, consciousness, and black holes, are CAUSED by Golden Ratio in waves of charge.
Nassim- meantime replied- that altho he sees Golden Ratio emerge from his black hole equations repeatedly- he sees it as an effect of black holes/ gravity - not the cause. ... Clearly - from the logic of waves- I say the black hole / gravity is the effect of golden ratio and not the other way around!
- altho some might say that chicken and egg difference- may be just semantic.. at least we agree on the profound importance of Golden RATIO../ fractality..
AND love :
perfect embedding IS perfect fusion IS perfect compression... ah the romance.
note Nassim's fascinating defense of his Black Hole as Proton below.. exerpted below..
Then I discovered my equation that proved Golden Ratio is what absolutely determines hydrogen geometry - TO CENTER
strong evidence that golden ratio is what holds hydrogen together (makes it fractal in space and time- since in addition to derived the radius of hydrogen from golden ratio times planck length - I showed that the frequency of hydrogen essentially links golden ratio to planck time!)
We were well on our way - to showing that Golden Ratio fractal phase conjugation was the origin of all centripetal - forces holding things together- when Nassim showed that Golden Ratio is the "Global Scaling" ( goldenmean.info/globalscaling ) - constant of all major masses: (see Golden Ratio / Phi- SCALING LAW FOR ALL ORGANIZED MATTER- from Nassim - below in this exerpt from goldenmean.info/fractalworld
4. The cover of Nature Magazine announced THE UNIVERSE IS DODECAHEDRAL - while the cover of New Scientist magazine announced THE UNIVERSE IS FRACTAL. What is the one way - they BOTH could be right? If the best (electric compressibility) Fractal in 3D is the stellated Dodec - AND - if this is the only way the wave system of the universe COULD emerge from chaos IN to stable gravity!
The CHALLENGE: Provide evidence that the stellated dodecahedron (dodeca/ icosa) is the optimum 3 dimensional fractal for electric fields. If possible (not necessarily required) - provide further mathematic / experimental evidence that this is also the essential geometry of Poincare S3 symmetry associated with gravity, and possibly Cabali Yau , and probably - that this is the reason for the major 26 string theory hypothesis- namely that the 26 holes the the ZOME dodec/ icos symmetry (6dodec axis + 7 tetra=13*2) are the reason for the 26 string model. Discussion: goldenmean.info/gravitycode , goldenmean.info/gravitycause
Note Dan Winter - was probably first to publish (book"One Crystals Dance") that the x,y,z coordinate of every node in an infinite dodeca/ icosa nest is a simple whole number multiple of Golden Ratio. Indicating that distance to centerline (x,y z) remains in Phi proportion - thruout it's scale invariance - clearly for quantum mechanical reasons of constructive charge interference: the implosion of charge called Gravity.
3. Golden Ratio solar system: spirasolaris.ca (above) has provided significant mathematic evidence that Golden Ratio is the key geometry factor in the arrangement of the major planets of our solar system. This indicates Kepler was right to look for the platonic solids nest in planetary orbitals. Little did they guess this was the cause of gravity.
The Challenge: provide significant mathematic and or experimental evidence that the solar system requires the Golden Ratio geometrics in order to stabilize her gravity (for example that each time major solar system masses are pushed out of Golden Ratio, their gravity field stability is reduced significantly.). Thus further evidencing that Golden Ratio is the cause of gravity. (end exerpt from link)
The following 3 visuals(2 animation) are graphed from my original equation of Golden Ratio on the correct conic dodeca stellation - (see vertex coordinates below)
of how Hydrogen Radii- nest / embed into the PLANK LENGTH (field coupling- to MAKE GRAVITY) - using GOLDEN RATIO - successful wave adding and multiplying (non-destructive compression) : (the next 10 graphics are original from Dan Winter)
Note -from Dan - my new equation for hydrogen - proves that these visuals are precisely the geometric relationship of hydrogen radii - to it's planck length center!
CONSTRUCTIVE charge collapse- as the cause of the making of matter (Nassim's black hole effect?) illustrated.
< Star Mother- infinite Dodeca Stellation by Golden Ratio (heart of E8)
Note how the x,y,z values of each of the vertex of all the nodes in the Infinite Dodeca/ Icosa golden ratio Stellation - we call - The "star mother"- are simple exponents (whole number multiples) of Golden Mean .618 , 1.0, 1.618, 2.618
This set assumes- cube edge = 2 units / So the tetra edges would be square root of 2 times 2 / Dodeca edge = .618 times 2 / Icosa edge = 1.618 times 2 / and the NEXT outer dodeca stellation edge 2.618 times 2
-- Vertex of the octahedron: (6) / 0,1,0 / 1,0,0 / 0, -1,0 / -1,0,0 / 0,0,1 / 0,0,-1
-- Vertex of the cube (8) / 1,1,1 / 1,-1,1 / -1,-1,1 / -1,1,1, / 1,1,-1 / 1,-1,-1 / -1,-1,-1 / -1,1,-1
-- Vertex of the dodecahedron (20): The dodeca vertex are composed exactly of the above 8 vertex of the cube- PLUS-these additional 12: -.618, 1.618, 0 / .618, 1.618, 0 / 1.618, 0, .618 / 1.618, 0, -.618 / -.618, -1.618, 0 / .618, -1.618, 0 / -1.618, 0, .618 / -1.618, 0, -.618 / 0, .618, 1.618 / 0, -.618, 1.618 / 0, .618, -1.618 / 0, -.618, -1.618
--- Vertex of the Icosahedron (12): 2.618, 0, 1.618 / 2.618, 0, -1.618 / -2.618, 0, 1.618 / -2.618, 0, -1.618 / -1.618, 2.618, 0 / 1.618, 2.618, 0 / -1.618, -2.618, 0 / 1.618, -2.618, 0 / 0, 1.618, 2.618 / 0, -1.618, 2.618 / 0, 1.618, -2.618 / 0, -1.618, -2.618
-- Quoting further from One Crystal's Dance by Dan Winter - in his 20's
"Note how simple it is to continue infinitely.. - simply extend every icosahedron edge length straight out by ratio Golden Mean, to make another Dodeca, then extend that dodeca edge straight out again by Golden Ratio longer to make another icosa etc. Alternating (interdigitating) infinitely. Each succeeding dodeca or icosa can be plotted digitally by simply multiplying by Golden Mean squared (2.618) to the vertex coordinates of the previous!
Use vision to understand the physical (phi cycle) significance of this. The distance from every node to every axis of symmetry, AND to the core (center point) is ALWAYS a power of the GOLDEN MEAN. See 12 golden mean, spiral cones, in this required pyramid like angular relation, making our STAR MOTHER, and indirectly the dodecahedron of DNA. See concentric spheres as wave bubbles. The wave length must divide evenly into the RADIUS AS A POWER OF THE GOLDEN MEAN. This fulfills the requirement that waves colliding toward center of gravity (mass), in order to conserve momentum (order, memory, mind) must not interfere with each other. The harmonics make ONLY constructive interference as they nest in this way."
(30 years later this seems precisely predictive of El Naschie's GOLDEN QUANTUM FIELD THEORY- MATHEMATICS- agreeing that this FRACTALITY IS THE CAUSE OF GRAVITY. (see golden ratio proven in the structure of hydrogen.. goldenmean.info/poleshift - bottom see this nest become the atomic table: goldenmean.info/creation
MORE EVIDENCE GOLDEN RATIO CAUSES GRAVITY: (and now a short GOLDEN RATIO nod to Nassim Haramein-)...note how GOLDEN RATIO (phase conjugate) animates the UNIVERSAL SCALING of FREQUENCY vs Radius of UNVERSAL MASSES.
The remainder of this article- below - exerpt reprinted here from Nassim Haramein, theresonanceproject.org
We originally discussed these opposing conic relations- from Nassim- as evidence for PHASE CONJUGATE symmetry among stars: goldenmean.info/yalweh
Below - legend for the above: (U,G,S,A - datapoints defined)
* Scale Unification ??? A Universal Scaling Law For Organized Matter (PDF), by Nassim Haramein, Michael Hyson, and E.A. Rauscher.
From observational data and our theoretical analysis, we demonstrate that a scaling law can be written for all organized matter utilizing the Schwarzschild condition of a black hole, describing cosmological to sub-atomic structures. Of interest are solutions involving torque and Coriolis effects in the field equations. --- Significant observations have led to theoretical and experimental advancement describing systems undergoing gravitational collapse, including vacuum interactions. The universality of this scaling law suggests an underlying polarizable structured vacuum of mini white holes / black holes.- --- As the atomic and subatomic data points levels obey the scaling law, a computation is given demonstrating that the proton can be defined in terms of a Schwarzschild condition, when the vacuum structure is considered. Further, we briefly discuss the manner in which this polarizable structured vacuum can be described in terms of resolutions analogous to a fractal-like scaling as a means of renormalization at the Planck distance. Finally, we describe a new horizon we term the ???spin horizon??? which is defined as a result of a spacetime torque producing boundary conditions in the magnetohydrodynamic structures of galactic center black holes, which we demonstrate obeys similar dynamics as the interior of our sun., Preprint: N. Haramein, M. Hyson, E. A. Rauscher, Proceedings of The Unified Theories Conference (2008), Budapest, Hungary, Scale Unification: A Universal Scaling Law for Organized Matter, in Cs Varga, I. Dienes & R.L. Amoroso (eds.)
- end exerpt
I then wrote this up - as a summary that this Golden Ratio fractal phase conjugation is the cause of all centripetal forces at goldenmean.info/selforganization
Download Dan Winter's original paper-from the Proceedings of the First-(in the series) of UNIFIED FIELD PHYSICISTS -Budapest 05(&08)-
Exerpt from First Conference Proceedings: Dan Winter - in 05 & 06- First to Hypothesize- FRACTALITY as CAUSE of GRAVITY:
The First to Predict: Gravity's Electric CAUSE- is Golden Ratio FRACTALITY!-Paper -"Is Fractality: The Electrical Mechanism of Gravity,
(and Perception and Color Descrimination) pdf - from the CD / Proceedings: (w/ color graphics) 5.1 Meg : Ch19ADanWinter.pdf ,
Conference Links(w. Nassim, Eliz Rauscher, Richard Amoroso & Many others): goldenmean.info/budapest08/physicsoverview.html
This Narrated Intro is to accompany the 20 new films at goldenmean.info/malta
.. or the Real History of Science Behind the GRAIL- REINVENTED..
from Dan Winter- in part - a commentary on Vincent Bridges presentations in Malta.. (Note this summary begins with insights from Anton Parks - see goldenmean.info/angelscience , and zeitlin.net - Ages of Uras. Then picks up with many insights from Vincent Bridges- who connects the Vairocana skill- Hermes revolution - to the cave / dolmen building sacred space cultures as they moved from Egypt to Malta to South France. Important to note here- that altho the synthesis in my view - fits together well- Vincent does not accept the writings in general of Anton Parks, although Anton Parks has written what I think are incredible insights into the origin of Thoth / Tehuti / Ningishidda- today:HERMES!...the hero of our story.)
Short historical summary: When the Annunaki- Draconian remnant culture arrived here pre-Sumeria (Sommaire="Dragon")- Enki's father An (launching from Pleades- a 'reptilian' stronghold) - was fleeing the Annuna Orion wars- in part because he had cheated on the Draco law which allowed only cloning as the reproductive method. Enki's mother was herself a genetic rebel and teacher of radical cloning techniques. Enki's other name: Nudimud meant 'the cloner' - later to be named the biblical SAMUEL- and origin of the Padma SAMbava..-who also melted the rock-with his plasma aura density- in the cave in the east.
The quintessential problem of the arriving Sumerian Annunaki- (Draco .. Annuna)- was biologic decay. That loss of ability to sustain- biologic vitality - is variously expressed- as being 'fallen' - meaning loss of charge attraction in blood and DNA - loss of bliss - loss of immortality.. In terms of how that was reported - in the Sumerian, in Sitchens (controversial) analysis- and now in Anton Parks- what we see consistently described - is their problem with (what they considered) premature aging. SO this was a premiere problem to assign to their head science team. Enki - was with his science leader Tehuti- (later called TWT- which in the bible is called DWD: the LINE OF DAVID- in Egypt his name Thoth- becomes the NAME OF THE LINE OF KINGS..). Today we refer to him as Hermes- and to what he discovered about making the fusion electric field which would produce life and reduce -aging- we call the HERMETIC REVOLUTION. Hermes symbol: the CADUCCEUS is pretty much an accurate physics graph of how you render approaching dielectric field lines- toward CONJUGATION (phase conjugation) and fusion. This is an accurate symmetry physics to describe how to make the electric field- which causes life.
The Caduceus- historical inset: To add historical tapestry to the concept Caduceus- (phase conjugate at root- symbol of Hemes / Medicine / DNA)-Has anyone ever given you a real AUrigen root of the word CADUCEUS: Anton Parks has a fascinating story: that while Enki / Sam / Nudimud 'the cloner' was still evidently as much as a genetic klutz as the guy (who ran Rosslyn Chapel- shades of Templar ghosts) who built DOLLY THE SHEEP (what a sad way to die- the sheeple will follow). Point is Parks tells that the teachers - best ancestors of his mothers line- who actually HAD some long term intent - snuck in some real psychokinetic DNA into Enki's genetic cookery - literally WHEN HE WASN'T LOOKING (hint: Ptah-Taal- 12the dimension DNA- means recursive folded braid discipline- shades of 'boson 7' 'micro-chloridians in the blood' luke...) > Those teachers of the GOOD Draco / annunaki - real ancestors of fallen Nephalim Annunaki - (Seraphic / Ophanic?) - were called KADISTU - meaning 'Life Designers' - which HE says is the AUrigen of our word K/CADUCEUS ( do YOU know where the word came from?
In biblical terms- the arrangement of particular stone dolmen to function as capacitors- to fabricate that immortalizing field effect- was called- raising a SHEM unto the Lord. Later - that word SHEM (Sitchen calls it "highward fire stone"- meaning in effect FRACTAL OR CONJUGATE CAPACITOR) - was translated to mean THE ALTAR IN CHURCH, and originated our word SHEM-AN (A Shaman is one who knows how to make the field..). The way plasma fields make this SCHEM of SCHEME or symmetry- to create centripetal fusion- is the origin of our term alKHEMy and KHEMistry - as it is the key to FUSION (implosive compression) and ONENESS in general. (Fusion researchers learned from us - that their key element- palladium is profoundly dodecahedral- guess what geometry that makes: golden ratio - phase conjugate).
You can see a modern example- of a life giving electric field generator (analogous to the field effect at Stonehenge which causes seed germination) at fractalfield.com/pyraphi , along with more electrical engineering description and testing.
In order now to introduce - the next segment in our thumbnail view - of the Hermetic history- it is necessary to understand a little bit about what happens to the plasma field around the human body - if you get really good at attracting charge (bliss). The plasma field gets dense. (Read more at goldenmean.info/kundalini ). Dense enough to melt stone.
The next heroes in our story are -Padma SAMbave- and John (Traphimius) son of Magdalen- both direct descendants of Thoth / Hermes- (Sam / Jon- meaning - to branch fractally as in Scion.). This is the real history of grail- meaning access to charge fractality / implosion in biologic plasma (beautiful graphic history : goldenmean.info/grail ).
This is where we pick up the story with Vincent Bridges- historical study (remember- Vincent himself - does not agree with the 'ET' Anton Parks - part of the story above- but his scholarship about more recent history is quite academically powerful.)
For this next part of the story -after reading this summary / intro - the reader is urged to view- the 4 films (out of 20) at goldenmean.info/malta which are Vincent Bridges- himself narrating this next part of story.
Vincent suggests that the lineage- probably of the Thoth / line of David- may well be related to the Doliocephallic (cone-head) skulls. They are often linked to the cone- head image of Akhanaton and Tut. (Twt.- aton- / ATUN- meaning Enki's line). These skulls lead us on a trail... Egypt, Malta, South France.. and later Peru. (My ET opinion of this- not Vincent's view - agrees with Daniel Stewart:"God King Akhunaton"'s view- that the ATUN / Akhanaton - lineage was somehow linked to Sirius.- the 'cone heads')
This is the part where the history meets the science. Vincent suggests that ancient cultures- like the Egyptians had learned how to assemble stones to create a life giving initiation field- which gave survival a leap forward. When (piezoelectric / paramagnetic) stones were arranged with the right (fractal) electric knowledge- what was produced was an electric field (phase conjugate dielectric)- which could:
- save agriculture during starving times by accelerating germination / growth / metabolism (see our measurements in the Pyraphi)
- initiate priests- accelerate mentation - focus thought- ( see how golden ratio phase conjugate EEG for peak perception - goldenmean.info/clinicalintro
- reduce aging / increase food storage- reduce decay
- provide an electrically fractal / charge distribution space where memory could be brought efficiently through BIRTH AND DEATH. (note how Korotkov measures the fractality in air - which indigenous people regularly make phone calls to their ancestors).
- now later today - in modern physics we now know this centripetal field (see Pyraphi) can be used for things like
+bone and tissue regeneration
+switching stem cell growth
+isolating from ELF pollution / EMF pulses
+non-destructively containing radioactive materials
So the short version of this story - is that the skill to build these kind of dolmen - moved from Amenti / Amarna in Egypt- where Akhunaton in ATUN's line- probably became the Moses who founded the Essene's science..
.. So -the real hermetic revolution is implementing the knowledge of building the fractal field. If you want the longer - more romantic version of the story.. see the films.
more on this science applied - at fractalfield.com/pyraphi
Important note: from a commercial perspective the history story is a highly forgettable - optional reading- nightmare- which is best and possible to wake up from ONLY when you learn the SCIENCE LESSON!
Note: In these films- and at goldenmean.info/scienceofalchemy
Vincent is basically saying the history clearly indicates the original philosophers stone, projective powder of alchemy - was the ground up- meteoritic glass of the
Muslum KABBAH stone..
See the film about GOLDEN RATIO , 1.618 and the MYSTERIES OF THE KABBAH..
when (meteoritic) glass is homogenously propagated wth (platinum group metal) gold vapor - it becomes a potent phase conjugate dielectric..
which is golden ratio capacitance- essentially
(bioactivity example: fractalfield.com/pyraphi )
sometimes called the philosophers stone, or projective powder - see;
This (Implosive / Centripetal ) FRACTAL FIELD EFFECT- is what here is called -vairocana effect - the life giving field effect core of the HERMETIC revolution.
Nature by Numbers (Fibonacci Sequence & The Golden Ratio) .. film to help put you in the mood...
SO... THE EMBEDDING PRODUCED BY LOVE... GOLDEN RATIO - IS- IN FACT - WHAT HOLDS THINGS TOGETHER!
When I first presented my paper "Golden Ratio Fractality-The Electric Cause of Gravity" in the proceedings of our first (of 2) Unified Field Physicists Conference in Budapest - (Nassim, Richard Amoroso, Eliz. Rauscher and many luminaries were present) - the question Elizabeth Rauscher asked me was about the origin of charge and spin.
Origin of Spin: charge as a relatively viscous and compressible medium-
as Paul LaViolette explained during our conversations in Athens last week- his Sub Quantum Kinetics- is clear that mass is basically a connected coherent wave envelope of travelling charge- which stores the inertia called mass. This gives Paul's theory the ability to account for attractions in the plasma between masses- as direct coupling - since every so called atom or particle (envelope of charge) IS essentially a field effect available for all forms of field coupling (no simple billiard balls bouncing around in this discussion- it's all "Wavy Gravy" to use the name of our good friend from years ago.).
So -I suggest- charge is the centripetal versus centrifugal - rarefacton / compression of the background ether. Movcment in that media- which inherently stores the inertia we call 'mass' is only possible in symmetric rotation- (quantized mechanics) because all other movements - would self cancel their waveform. This symmetric rotation stores the inertia called mass, and has the period of rotation- called time. (See fractality in time as the charge coupling origin of synchronicity: goldenmean.info/coincidence )
Rotation is thus the only creator of mass and time. What needs to be added to this insight - is that only fractality - golden ratio conjugation of phases- turns the compression toward center- into acceleration - which then centripetally defines gravity and centripetal forces in general. In other words- the least self cancelling wave form (most constructive interference) IS golden ratio (phase conjugate fractality)- and that is how black holes and gravity happened.
Paul however is clear- that for him - this in NO way accounts for the black hole idea. On this - I think Nassim is very right and Paul is very wrong. The reason Paul LaViolette is wrong on this- became clear - when I further asked him if he was aware that Golden Mean ratio (so essential to Nassim's defense of this Global Scaliing of All Masses) - was in fact the generalized solution to most constructive (charge) wave interference. (My work: www.goldenmean.info/matrix ). This is then what makes Golden Ratio also the solution to constructive wave compression (Einstein's unsolved headache) - and therefore to Gravity and Black Holes and all centripetal forces. (The physics summary I started at goldenmean.info/selforganization )
So because Paul was unaware how fundamental Golden Ratio is to the generation of ALL CENTRIPETAL FORCES - he of course could not grasp the importance of Golden Ratio - in black hole theory (I hypothesize this specifically includes Golden Ratio as the essential cause and mechanism and origin of gravity, life, color , perception , bliss etc).
What I LIKE- is that Nassim - unlike Paul LaViolette- is moving nicely in this direction!
Nassim's evidence- primary defense (exerpt below) of his somewhat controversial proton mass theory is that- it (his Schwarzschield proton geometry) fits exquisitely on the Golden Rato line..-predicting the frequency to size ratio of most ALL of the universes great masses: Planck, Proton, Solar, Galaxy, Universe..
and.." the mass versus radius graph reveals a hidden and profound meaning; that is, that organized matter in the Universe seems to scale in terms of its density towards the black hole condition."
So the attraction and the glue which holds things together- for Nassim- IS the (golden ration nesting) perfect embedding .. LOVE.. of the waves..
The same 'loving embedability / nesting' - ratio you create in a loving touch.. and a blissful mind..!
Animating this geometry - (phase conjugate- implosive FUSION - perfect nesting.. ) we have the romantic..
(New article from Nassim's site- exerpt) " http://theresonanceproject.org/bob.html
In which Nassim's key defense of his new universal Black Hole theory rests on Golden Ratio: (exerpt here)
... point #2, the gentleman suggests that my Schwarzschild Proton paper has no merit as such, and supports his argument using three comments. I will address them one by one (for a complete rebuttal of his technical criticisms of the Schwarzschild proton, read http://theresonanceproject.org/sp_manifesto.html).
a) 'His overall argument is circular'
This assertion is quite remarkable as The Schwarzschild Proton, while proposing a unification view, attempts to resolve a very significant circular argument found in the standard model. Almost a century ago, when it was determined that there seemed to be a highly charged nucleon at the center of atoms that contained most of their mass and that this entity was composed of particles that somehow must have been held together against their electrostatic charge (Coulomb repulsion), the scientific community at large adopted the concept of some mysterious strong force plucked out of thin air that happened to be in the correct proportion to produce a confinement necessary for proton to proton interaction. Later on it was found that the proton seemed to have internal structures called quarks and since those are confined in an even much smaller space, the color force was elaborated and made to be infinitely strong. Now the strong force at the proton scale was said to be only a remnant of the all-powerful color force of infinite nature mediated by gluons. Nowhere in the standard model is there given an argument for the source of energy that would be necessary to produce a force of infinite nature 'that is, the strongest force in the Universe.
Ironically, this is a perfect example of circular thinking. One finds an error in his or her current physical model that doesn't agree with experiment or observation, then proceeds to invent a new kind of force or even a new kind of matter (in the case of the dark matter/dark energy allegories, see below) then gives this new invention exactly the characteristics necessary to make the initial model work. Then the researcher asserts that the new quantity is confirmed, since it is predicted by the initial model which otherwise fails.
In order for the argument of the standard model to not be circular, a mechanism for the production of an infinite confining force would have had to be given, and this is exactly what The Schwarzschild Proton does. It does so by postulating a certain amount of coherent and polarized structure in the available vacuum fluctuations present at the quantum scale (known to produce foam-like structures in the spacetime manifold, according to the standard model) and contributing to high curvature near or at the horizon. This is not addressed or elaborated on in The Schwarzschild Proton paper, although it is better referenced in the final copy for publication which is not available on the internet yet. However, my earlier papers Collective Coherent Oscillation Plasma Modes In Surrounding Media of Black Holes and Vacuum Structure - Quantum Processes with Considerations of Spacetime Torque and Coriolis Forces and Spinors, Twistors, Quaternions, and the "Spacetime" Torus Topology treated this very issue and showed that soliton-like structures and acoustic plasma solutions found in the neighborhood of horizons demand a certain amount of coherent structure in the vacuum at the quantum level. Therefore, the Schwarzschild paper is not a stand-alone paper, but a continuation of investigation of a certain approach to the structure of spacetime which involves distortions due to torque and Coriolis effect which may produce discreteness at the quantum level resolving the division between the relativistic world and the quantum world. This approach has been successful in predicting many astrophysical phenomenons, including the existence of black holes prior to galactic formation (http://www.nrao.edu/pr/2009/bhbulge/). The following quote is one example from The Origin of Spin: A Consideration of Torque and Coriolis Forces in Einstein's Field Equations and Grand Unification Theory by Nassim Haramein and E.A. Rauscher.
'In this section we have shown that we can modify Einstein's field equations and the Kerr-Newman solution in order to accommodate torque and the Coriolis forces, which we term the Haramein-Rauscher solution. Since Einstein's field equations obey the Laplace-Poisson condition, the torquing of spacetime may be the result of the vacuum gradient density in the presence of matter-energy. Modification of the field equations makes it possible to include the torque terms and hence generate more realistic solutions. These solutions more comprehensively describe the dynamical rotational structures of galaxies, novae, supernovae, and other astrophysical structures which in this case are driven by a spacetime torque. Hence, with the inclusion of torque and Coriolis effects in Einstein's field equations, the spacetime manifold correlates well with the observable mechanisms of black holes, galactic topology, supernova formation, stellar plasma dynamics and planetary science such as ring formation and the Coriolis structure of atmospheric dynamics. This may lead to a model where the driving torque and the dynamical Coriolis forces of the spacetime manifold topology are responsible for the observed early formation of mature spiral galaxies . Further, our model is consistent with galactic structures, the super-massive black hole at their centers, as well as polar jets, accretion disks, spiral arms and galactic halo formations.'
[Reference 18. Robert G. Abraham et al., 'The Gemini Deep Deep Survey.I. Introduction to the Survey,' Catalogs, and Composite Spectra, AJ. 127, 2455.]
The impetus for the Schwarzschild Proton paper was merely to show that when a proton is treated as a mini black hole, its interactive behavior actually predicts well (considering a first order approximation since a full tensor analysis would need to be included using the Kerr-Newman metric and eventually the Haramein-Rauscher solution) the gamma emission, the interaction time and the so-called 'anomalous magnetic moment' of the proton ' which now has been given a source through the polarized vacuum structure.
b) 'The nucleus of a single atom of hydrogen has a mass of nearly a billion tons.'
As the gentleman points out, this may be a silly thing to predict. Obviously, I thought of modifying G and the Planck's scale so that the Schwarzschild Proton mass would come out to the standard value (as others have done http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0701006), however my point in this paper is actually to show (and this is why I added a scaling graph) that objects in the Universe from universal size to subatomic particles tend towards the Schwarzschild condition as demonstrated by the scaling graph in the paper. It was clear to me when I first made the calculation that this would be an issue, and this is exactly why I included a graph based on observational data of the mass of objects in the Universe from universal size to quasars, galactic structures, stellar size objects and so on to see if the Schwarzschild proton mass had any merit whatsoever. Since the initial calculation I have made with the collaboration of Dr. Hyson, we have made many graphs, attempting to find a way to show the standard proton mass to be related to the rest of the objects in the Universe including the Planck's mass. But in every case, whether it is the log of the mass versus the log of the surface area or the log of the mass versus surface volume ratio, or mass versus entropy (surface), the Schwarzschild condition proton falls nicely on the trend line (in some cases where we have a multitude of objects from Universal size to quasars, large galactic clusters, local superclusters and so on), while the standard model proton always falls completely off the trend line. Therefore, the mass versus radius graph reveals a hidden and profound meaning; that is, that organized matter in the Universe seems to scale in terms of its density towards the black hole condition.
The gentleman asked 'why we never measure this huge mass when we weigh hydrogen (or anything else)'. First of all, here the gentleman makes a common error in his language (and I will assume it is not an error in his understanding of physics), as mass and weight are two different animals (http://www.hitxp.com/phy/cph/020902.htm). More importantly, the issue lies in the fact that so far the standard model has been unable to identify a source for the mass of objects, such as the mass of particles, as the concept of mass is a fairly esoteric concept. The best model so far from the mainstream is the Higgs mechanism which has encountered serious obstacles. Read the Higgs mass under Hierarchy problem http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hierarchy_problem#The_Higgs_Mass. Here the standard model is experiencing issues in predictions that conservatively include some 11 orders of magnitude for unification. There are fundamental issues with the standard model's understanding of mass and energy, although these issues are not commonly acknowledged. The scaling graph in The Schwarzschild Proton paper is much more than a statement about only the proton entity; it is also a statement of relationships in scales defining horizons as a quantization of spacetime.
One of the best examples is the so-called bare mass or bare field in quantum field theory. This issue has been so buried that many physicists are completely unaware of it, and the issue does not even appear as an entry in Wikipedia as very little literature can be found on it. However, the problem is extremely significant, that is, that even the standard model does not come anywhere close to predicting the mass of an atom that has been 'measured' in experimental studies. In fact, when the standard model does an analysis of an electron entity, it finds that this entity must have infinite mass and infinite charge indeed. The approach of the standard model has been to ignore these results and use a renormalization term typically denoted as Z-1 to make the theory agree with experimental studies http://universe-review.ca/R15-12-QFT.htm#Green. This is an enormous fudge factor and in this article discussing it http://sci.tech-archive.net/Archive/sci.physics/2008-02/msg01081.html and quoting reputable physicists, the gentleman's conclusions are quite telling:
''a bare electron charge and mass is infinite.. something not even Wilson Renormalization Group can get rid of. So I just wonder what is the source of the bare electron infinite charge and mass. What do you think? Initially I think it's something akin to black hole singurality but in reality it may involve more exotic physics.'
In one way the Schwarzschild proton elucidates the fact that the energy potential necessary for confinement must be accounted for and in the final copy of The Schwarzschild Proton (not available on the net yet as it is in the publishing process) we calculate the mass dilation resulting from a proton rotating near relativistic speeds and find that at a velocity of 10^-39 slower than C, the proton exhibits the mass of a Schwarzschild entity. From there, I am planning on addressing the mass issue directly in an upcoming paper, showing that the solution to the Schwarzschild proton, which was only a first order approximation as mentioned above, should be eventually addressed in a Kerr-Newman and more importantly in a Haramein-Rauscher metric, where torque and Coriolis effects are accounted for. These effects may show that the distortion of the metrical space at the surface event horizon of the black hole structure produces turbulence and high curvature that may not be detectable from a simple long-range mass spectrometer or scattering experiments, which do not examine the highly curved structure near and at the horizon. In this case the black hole has hairs due to Coriolis effects on the structure of spacetime (Others have come to similar conclusions from completely different approaches http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9201059v1, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9604134v2, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9609084v1, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9202014v1), and it is in that fashion that I am planning on explaining the reason why the current so-called rest mass of the proton is so far off the Schwarzschild condition and the apparent trend of other organized matter in our Universe.
On the cosmological level, this highly turbulent structure of horizons where velocities approach C may be the source of matter creation through sheering of the spacetime manifold itself at the quantum level which predicts a continuous matter creation model at black hole horizons instead of the current Big Bang approach with its dark matter/dark energy allegories http://cosmologystatement.org/. Recent findings http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/03/100318-black-holes-immaculate-conception/ not only confirm the existence of black holes prior to galactic formation but as well may eventually confirm matter creation processes near and at horizons, as in a continuous creation model, instead of the conventional accretion of particles and dust, the source of which has not been identified by the standard Big Bang model http://cosmologystatement.org
c) 'The paper, while using some scientific terms, is presented at a very basic level'Nassim is merely playing with equations from student textbooks'
To this assertion I believe once again that Einstein said it most eloquently, "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." The Schwarzschild Proton paper could have been much more complex, as I had, with the collaboration of Dr. Rauscher and some discussions I've had with Dr. Rowlands :: http://theresonanceproject.org/uni/peter_rowlands.html, found multiple ways to go about it. For instance, in 2003 Dr. Rauscher and I elaborated a solution that comes to almost the same conclusions as the Schwarzschild Proton using QCD and QED. Further, Dr. Rowlands' rewrite system (http://www.worldscibooks.com/physics/6544.html) predicts as well singularity-like structures at the atomic scale.
The initial first drafts of the Schwarzschild Proton included many of these more advanced complexities; however my critics had already commented that my earlier papers were complex and too convoluted to make clear my approach. Furthermore, it was important to me for the Schwarzschild proton to be as clear and simple as possible, so that even a college level student could understand the mathematics and follow the logic to its conclusions. There was a certain beauty about this simplicity, and I purposefully stripped any complexities I could, and at the end of the day I may have gone a little bit too far with that idea. What I mean by that is that I could have put a little more beef around the arguments necessary for the reader to understand the approach I am taking and it is important to note that the current available version on the Internet was a draft copy that was not meant for publication. It was produced barely on time for the deadline for the CASYS conference while in the middle of touring during the summer of 2009. The paper will soon be updated as it is undergoing peer review and it was already asked of me to provide better references and to beef up certain sections.
One of the reasons the CASYS group thought of the merit of my paper to be worthy of an award is mostly likely because of my ongoing relationship with this group which has been following the development of my approach throughout the years and they could see the Schwarzschild Proton paper in the context of the other papers I have published.
In point #3, we find a more serious assertion about my alleged fraudulent nature. The gentleman proceeds to comment on an obscure and private discussion between myself and another researcher, Marko Rodin which is actually an illegal video as it was never approved for publication. Nowhere in any text or in any multimedia material do I ascertain the accuracy or the validity of this anecdotal discovery I was considering some years ago. If the accuracy of the relationship between the phi curve and the ninth division of a circle structure defined by Mr. Rodin's mathematics had been fully explored and turned out to be valid, it would be interesting and I would have certainly proceeded in publishing or discussing it in public and so on. However, I did no such thing since I knew very well that the confirmation of the mathematics had not been done and since my interest has been fairly low and my time extremely busy, I had not been able to complete the proof. I actually made that quite clear in an email to a group of researchers in various fields that were inquiring about the approach I took to produce the spiral. A debate flared up and I had to immediately intervene as I was privy to the situation. My email to the group, sent on September 26, 2009, is as follows:
I am sorry if I inadvertently contributed to some confusion! I do not have the time to render the math for what I've done but the jepg's and gif animation I created are self explanatory. It is important to realize that when I did this some 5 years ago I mentioned it to Marko in an anecdotal but interesting way. I did not do a full mathematical analysis. If someone is interested I would love to see it as there may be a deeper meaning to it or not.
So thank you again, Dr. Bob-a-thon, for having elucidated this calculation. However I'd like to add that as a first order approximation my finding was approximately 10% off, and a proper analysis would look at the relationship to the Fibonacci sequence, which approximates phi, as is found in nature, where is not found in nature as an exact representation. I'd love to hear the gentleman's thoughts, as he may want to contribute more than criticism and character assassination. Whatever the case may be, to discredit all of my work because I may have had a thought in a private conversation with another researcher that may have been inaccurate or incomplete is inappropriate. In general, I attempt to find everything I can find on the matter before I make public statements that would mislead the population. Having that said, I am sure in the prolific amount of subjects I have studied, that extends from advanced physics to ancient civilization and anthropology, that I have most likely made errors that were not purposefully attempting to deceive. Many errors have been found in the body of work of some of the most prominent physicists and scientists on the planet which does not necessarily discredit their contribution to humanity as a whole. Furthermore, many things that are taught in universities today may be found to be completely incorrect tomorrow and that certainly wouldn't make all the teachers purposefully attempting to deceive the students (although there is a certain tendency in many educators to skip over some of the difficulties that current theories may have in order to maintain an appearance of absolute truth).
In point #4: A question. How is it that there is absolutely no support from any part of the scientific community for any of Nassim's ideas, talks, or research?
Once again, the gentleman jumps to conclusions without having all the facts. Here are a few endorsements from prominent scientists (http://theresonanceproject.org/testimonials.html)) who think that my approach has merit and that throughout the years have been collaborating and contributing to my knowledge base. Furthermore, as I provided links above (and there are more not provided here), other researchers with serious credentials are quickly coming to the same conclusions I have regarding the singular nature of the atomic world.
a) 'because the scientific establishment are afraid of having all their precious theories overturned?'
To that statement, all I can say is that history speaks for itself as any new significant changes that were brought to the scientific community were typically largely resisted, ridiculed and then eventually accepted. As Schopenhauer said, 'All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.' I would like to propose here that there is a movement, which I believe is unstoppable, that will eventually come to conclude that early interpretations of the quantum world were the result of the misunderstanding of the singular nature of atomic nuclei.
This change may take time and the period is directly related to the resistance of the current paradigm to this fundamental change in our view of the Universe. It is not a trivial change, and it is absolutely normal that there is great resistance as the current theories have done an excellent job for a long time. However, we have reached a moment where some of the fundamental issues such as the origin of mass, electromagnetism, spin, and certainly unification, etc. must be addressed.
As for the assertion from the gentleman that mentioned the typical argumentative and unfriendly nature of the scientific community, I believe that these attitudes are one of the most detrimental components to human evolution and transcendence of some of our most tremendous challenges. The scientific community, and certainly the world as a whole, must eventually come to learn that collaboration and constructive criticism always produce a better outcome for everyone than competition and warring, whether as name-calling or literally.
b) 'because scientists are incapable of seeing outside the box that they were trained to think in, and are too proud to accept radical suggestion from an outsider?'
(c) because they haven't come across his ideas yet?
(d) because anyone with an understanding of science can see that his claims and his methods are not scientific in any sense of the term, and that he doesn't actually know what he's talking about?
b), c) and d) are addressed by the answers above. However the gentleman mentions Garrett Lisi as an example of a renegade physicist being accepted by the mainstream scientific community. To this I would reply that Mr. Lisi published a set of equations that very much complements the current approach and as such, it is not a radical change in the perspective of the particle world - (although Mr. Lisi's theory I believe has furthered a specific approach to particle physics, it has of lately been found to have some serious issues http://arxiv.org/abs/0905.2658). What's interesting, however, is that once again it is some independent person, in this case a surfer dude living in a van (as I did for many years in order to finance my research) who came to advance the thinking of millions of professional scientists who get, in general, good salaries and can dedicate most of their time to research instead of survival. What does that tell us about the educational system and the current approach to advanced research?
In the case of someone bringing forth ideas that are much more radical, I would like to add this quote from this Associated Press article http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7536665/ns/technology_and_science-science/
Less tolerance for renegades?
"...Maybe there is an Einstein out there today," said Columbia University physicist Brian Greene, "but it would be a lot harder for him to be heard." Especially considering what Einstein was proposing.
"The actual fabric of space and time curving? My God, what an idea!" Greene said at a recent gathering at the Aspen Institute. "It takes a certain type of person who will bang his head against the wall because you believe you'll find the solution."
Perhaps the best examples are the five scientific papers Einstein wrote in his "miracle year" of 1905. These "thought experiments" were pages of calculations signed and submitted to the prestigious journal Annalen der Physik by a virtual unknown. There were no footnotes or citations.
What might happen to such a submission today?
"We all get papers like those in the mail," Greene said. "We put them in the crank file."
Furthermore, comments are made below the gentleman's article criticizing the fact that I have set up various programs and sales in a nonprofit foundation and that these activities are not typical of scientific researchers. Well, in order to eventually get out of my van and be able to continue doing advanced research, not only in theoretical physics but as well in technological developments, it was necessary for me to reach out for public support since I receive no financial support from large institutions or governmental structures. Therefore, I have had to divide my time between running an organization to produce resources necessary for ongoing research, the research itself and, of course, my family responsibilities. This has been most challenging and certainly has not put me in a position of great wealth to this day. The foundation struggles every month to make ends meet (especially in this economy), and my family is barely able to receive the financial support it needs.
Point #5. A similar question. How is it that none of his radical historical ideas have any support from any academic institutions either?
Most of the points given in #5 are also addressed above. This section is where the gentleman proclaims himself and his institution the beholder of the truth and the only truth as if the standard model was a complete and done deal. In the discussion below, confusion occurs because statements are made proclaiming that I encouraged acquaintances to learn specific math skills so that they may help. This does not mean that I don't understand math or that my math skills are not good enough to do what I do. As mentioned in those comments, I am the first one to admit that I wish my mathematical capacity was much higher, but that doesn't mean that it's not good enough to do what I do with some of the help of others. Most physics projects today involve multiple physicists helping each other with various skills. I do understand enough math to write the papers I have written with the help of other researchers, however my extreme dyslexia has been a handicap for most of my life and as such this struggle is not so unusual in the scientific community as Einstein encountered it himself. I do encourage people that want to contribute to the research to learn the math skills necessary to understand the previous work that has been published and to be able to contribute useful and accurate suggestions.
Thereafter there is some discussion about how my work should be classified. There is no doubt that my work in the field of physics belongs in the box of physics and nowhere else. However, the whole of my research does not belong in any of the boxes available in the current mainstream community as it touches areas from advanced physics to philosophy and spiritual concepts and, as such, will never be placed in any conventional box as it is an all-encompassing holistic approach to existence ' and nothing less. The gentleman is quite welcome to disagree with this unusual approach to science and philosophy; however, I would suggest in the future not only that his comments remain professionally based but even that his criticism be constructive and collaborative in nature as I can see that the gentleman has a great mind and a good knowledge base. Once again, we live at a critical time in history where we need to learn to collaborate and contribute to each other with mutual respect, no matter how widely divergent our opinions may be, in order to overcome many of the challenges we are facing today.
Absolute certainty that an idea is wrong'is an attitude that has no place in science and one that discredits the scientific enterprise. ' Brian Josephson, Nobel Laureate
The Resonance Project